Christian v. Waid
Case Number: 3:2005cv00879
Filed: November 7, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Huntington Office
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Chambers
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER the Court Adopts the Magistrate's Judge's 78 Proposed Findings and Recommendations, as modified; Christian's objections to the finding that the West Virginia recidivist penalty would have applied to him is Granted; all other objections are Denied; the Court Orders: Respondent's 54 motion for summary judgment is Granted; Christian's 60 motion for summary judgment is Denied; Christian's 39 petition for a writ of habeas corpus is Denied; Christian's 58 Motion to engage in discovery is Denied; Christian's 59 Motion for Production of telephone recordings is Denied; the Court Issues a certificate of appealability on the narrow issue of whether counsel rendered inef fective assistance in advising Christian regarding the applicability of the recidivist statute to his case; and this action is Dimissed, with prejudice, and shall be stricken from the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/8/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christian v. Waid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?