Berry v. Chafin
Plaintiff: James W. Berry, Sr.
Defendant: Charles G. Chafin
Case Number: 3:2007cv00312
Filed: May 17, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Huntington Office
County: Kanawha
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Chambers
Presiding Judge: Maurice G. Taylor, Jr.
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopting Proposed Findings and Recommendation; Plaintiff's objections are denied and this action dismissed for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 9/15/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berry v. Chafin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James W. Berry, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles G. Chafin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?