Chaffin v. Nisource, Inc., et al
| Rhonella Chaffin |
| Nisource, Inc., Nisource Long-Term Disability Plan, Prudential Insurance Company of America and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 3:2008cv00870 |
| June 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 45 MOTION for Summary Judgment. The Cou rt rules as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 45 motion for Summary Judgment on Count 1 is denied, but her alternative request to remand the benefit issue raised in Count 1 is granted; (2) Plaintiff's 45 motion for Summary Judgment on Count 2 is denied as to Prudential, but granted as to NiSource. Plaintiff awarded judgment in the amount of $18,100.00 against NiSource; (3) NiSource's 42 motion for Summary Judgment on Count 1 is granted, but denied as to count 2; and, (4) Prudential's 40 motion for Summary Judgment is denied as to Count 1, but granted as to Count 2. The Court remands the issue of benefits to Prudential for further consideration. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/23/2010. (cc: attys) (gan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
