RubberLite, Inc., et al v Baychar Holdings, LLC, et al
| Rubberlite, Inc. and James Allen Mayo |
| Baychar Holdings, LLC, Baychar, Inc., Baychar and Does 1 Through 100 |
| 3:2008cv01106 |
| September 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office |
| Cabell |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Both |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
164
ORDER granting 111 MOTION for Summary Judgment; denying 112 MOTION for Summary Judgment. The Court further denies the Baychar Defendants' 123 Motion for Summary Judgment except to the extent the Court will not permit plaintiff to argue frau dulent and negligent misrepresentation or omission on the basis of the status of Claim 8 or the scivener's error regarding the corporate form of Baychar Holdings. Counterclaim Defendant James Mayo terminated. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/9/2010. (cc: attys) (gan)
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, granting plaintiff's 44 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 11/6/2009. (cc: attys) (gan)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denies without prejudice 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; the Court also Grants Plaintiffs request for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 2/24/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
