Cheesebrew v. Felman Production, Inc. et al
David Cheesebrew |
Felman Production, Inc. and Merdith Marker |
3:2009cv01129 |
October 16, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Mason |
Robert C. Chambers |
Plaintiff |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 6 MOTION to Remand to Circuit Court of Mason County and Orders the matter stricken from the docket; in addition, this case was designated as the lead case among 13 similar actions, for consideration of the moti on to remand; the reasoning and ultimate decision to remand this case is applicable to each of the other twelve cases; as a result, the Court Orders the following cases be remanded to State Court (3:09-1130) Dennison v. Felman Production, Inc., (3:09 -1131) Gibbs v. Felman Production, Inc., (3:09-1132) Hall v. Felman Production, Inc., (3:09-1133) Lieving v. Felman Production, Inc., (3:09-1134) Petrie v. Felman Production, Inc.; (3:09-1136), Rickard vs. Felman Production, Inc., (3:09-1137) Salla v . Felman Production, Inc., (3:09-1138) Sowards v. Felman Production, Inc., (3:09-1139) Stout v. Felman Production, Inc., (3:09-1140) Taylor v. Felman Production, Inc., (3:09-1142) Weethe v. Felman Production, Inc., (3:09-1143) Whalen v. Felman Production, Inc. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 12/23/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm) Modified on 12/29/2009 to correct typographical error (dcm). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.