Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc. v. Hobet Mining, LLC
| Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc., West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc. and Sierra Club |
| Hobet Mining, LLC |
| 3:2009cv01167 |
| October 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Cabell |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| None |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 Environmental Matters |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
285
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER regarding Plaintiffs' 279 MOTION to Join Additional Defendant, Order Status Report, Declare Liability for Stipulated Payments, and Permit Limited Discovery; granting the motion in part as to plaintiffs' reques t to join the Receivership Estate; holding in abeyance the plaintiffs' other requests for relief; directing the Clerk to add the Receivership Estate of ERP Environmental Fund, Inc. as a defendant in this suit. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/25/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
|
|
Filing
127
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 121 MOTION to Seal; granting 124 MOTION for Protective Order. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 7/6/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER SPECIFYING RELIEF The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter the Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit, document number 240 in case number 3:07-cv-00413, in this civil action; the Court Adopts the Hobet 22 Treatment Plan And Gnatt chart schedule; the Court appoints James H. Kyles, as Special Master; Conference with the Special Master and the parties is set for 10/26/2010 11:30 AM. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 10/8/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
|
|
Filing
49
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER For the reasons set forth, Hobet's motion to dismiss is Denied, and Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment Granted, as described supra; a hearing to address the scope and terms of the injunctive relief Plaintiffs are entitled to shall be held on 08/09/2010 at 1:30PM in Huntington. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 7/12/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 7 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, for Declaratory Judgment, for Permanent Injunction; denying 18 MOTION to Dismiss. A hearing to address the scope and terms of the injunctive relief plaintiffs are entitled to shall be held 8/9/2010, 1:30 PM, Huntington. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/14/2010. (cc: attys) (gan)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court orders that Hobet's 18 Motion to dismiss is denied as it contests the sufficiency of Plaintiffs' notice of intent and insofar as it argues that the Court lacks jurisdiction of Plaintiffs' SMCRA claims. The Court denies Hobet's request for consolidation. All of those issues presented by Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, declaratory relief, and injunctive relief, and in Hobet's motion to dismiss, which have not been resolved herein, shall be addressed at the hearing on 3/31/2010. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/29/2010. (cc: attys) (gan)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 7 MOTION for Summary Judgment; denying 18 MOTION to Dismiss ; a hearing on remaining issues related to the parties' motions is scheduled for 03/31/2010, at 10:00 am Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/10/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
