Withrow v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
Timothy Withrow |
Enterprise Holdings, Inc. |
3:2009cv01543 |
December 23, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Mason |
Robert C. Chambers |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 28 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply; denying 17 MOTION to Set Aside Dismissal; denying 18 MOTION for Expedited Hearing ; denying 19 MOTION to Intervene. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/19/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Withrow v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Timothy Withrow | |
Represented By: | J. C. Powell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Scott L. Winkelman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.