Martin et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
| Arch Fleming, Juanita Fleming and Jeffrey A. Martin |
| Shannon Cazad, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Angela Cooke |
| 3:2010cv00144 |
| February 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Mason |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
177
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 174 MOTION to Certify Question Regarding the Effect of an Insurers Failure to Comply with W.Va. Code Section 33-6-31d to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals; denying 174 MOTION for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 10/26/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm)
|
|
Filing
173
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 128 MOTION for Summary Judgment; denying 130 MOTION to Certify Class. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/22/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm)
|
|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 100 MOTION to Seal; granting in part and denying in part 101 MOTION for Determination of Privilege Status as set forth in Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 4/1/2011. (cc: attys) (gan)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER granting 89 MOTION to Compel; granting 89 MOTION to Expedite. Plaintiffs' motion to compel having been granted, the Court orders defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company to designate its Rule 30(b)(6) representativ es and to supply taht designation to plaintiffs no later than 5:00 PM today (2/22/2011.) Plaintiffs' request for an award of the costs associated with filing their motion to compel shall be held in abeyance at this time. Plaintiffs shall have 14 days from the date of entry of this order in which to supply the Court with an affidavit setting forth the expenses incurred and any supporting argument and citations. State Farm shall have 14 days thereafter to respond to plaintiffs' submission. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 2/22/2011. (cc: attys) (gan)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court denied as moot 27 MOTION to Stay Discovery; denying in part 14 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss Complaint in it entirety and Grants in part Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Fleming's common-law bad faith and Unfair Trade Practices Act claims; Defendant Cooke is therefore Dismissed from this case as no claim against her remains. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 9/30/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 4 MOTION to Remand to Circuit Court; the stay is now Ordered Lifted and the case Ordered to proceed; accordingly, Plaintiffs are Ordered to File any response to State Farm's pending motion to dismiss within 14 days, or on or before 08/26/2010; any reply to Plaintiffs' response shall be filed within 7 days of the response's filing; finally, the Court will enter a new Order And Notice, pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 16.1,shortly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/18/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 16 MOTION to Stay. This action is stayed in its entirety, pending resolution of the motion to remand. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 4/12/2010. (cc: attys) (gan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
