Damron v. O'Hanlon, et al
Plaintiff: |
Mark Damron |
Defendant: |
Dan O'Hanlon, William Fox and State of West Virginia |
Case Number: |
3:2010cv00698 |
Filed: |
April 30, 2010 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Office: |
Huntington Office |
County: |
Cabell |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
November 5, 2010 |
Filing
44
ORDER Plaintiff's Complaint be Dismissed with prejudice; finding as moot 33 MOTION for Hearing; finding as moot 34 MOTION for Hearing; finding as moot 35 MOTION for Hearing; finding as moot 36 MOTION to Compel; finding as moot 37 MOTIO N to Compel; finding as moot 38 MOTION to Compel; adopting Findings and Recommendations re 40 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; granting 6 MOTION to Amend; finding as moot 9 MOTION to Dismiss; finding as moot 13 MOTION to Dismiss; gran ting 16 MOTION to Amend; denying 1 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs; finding as moot 17 MOTION to Appoint Counsel ; finding as moot 18 MOTION for Discovery; finding as moot 22 MOTION to Compel; granting 25 MOTION to A mend; granting 26 MOTION to Amend; finding as moot 27 MOTION for Protective Order; Denying Plaintiff's Objections and Adopts and Incorporates herein the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 11/5/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?