Crump v. Morton-Smith
Norvell Webster Crump |
Susan Morton-Smith |
3:2010cv00788 |
June 3, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Other |
77 U.S.C. ยง 7777 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court accepts and incorporates the 31 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Eifert and dismisses plaintiff's 3 complaint. The Court denies plaintiff's 2 application to proceed without payment of fees or costs, plaintiff's 6 motion to transfer jurisdiction, and, plaintiff's 30 motion to withdraw guilty plea. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 11/15/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (gan) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Crump v. Morton-Smith | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Norvell Webster Crump | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Susan Morton-Smith | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.