Thomas v. Corbett
Deanna Thomas |
Sherry Lynn Corbett |
3:2010cv00790 |
June 3, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Kanawha |
Other |
77 U.S.C. ยง 7777 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 MOTION to Remand to Circuit Court of Wayne County; accordingly, the Court Directs the matter stricken from its docket; the Court does, however, Deny the instant motion insofar as it seeks costs and attorneys fees. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/2/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thomas v. Corbett | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Deanna Thomas | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sherry Lynn Corbett | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.