Adkins v. Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc.
Jessica Adkins |
Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc. |
3:2010cv00814 |
June 10, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Cabell |
Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1211 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 113 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 55 Plaintiff's MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 57 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 9/23/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Adkins v. Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jessica Adkins | |
Represented By: | Amy C. Crossan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.