Dixon v. United States of America
| Marcus Darnell Dixon |
| United States of America |
| 3:2010cv01143 |
| September 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Cabell |
| R. Clarke VanDervort |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court adopts the Findings and Recommendations sof the Magistrate Judge and denies the movant's 2255 motion and certificate of appealability; action dismissed. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/28/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm)
|
|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to Marcus Dixon; accepting and incorporating Magistrate Judge Eifert's 107 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; denying Movant's 80 and 86 MOTIONS to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) and re quest for evidentiary hearing and the appointment of counsel; DISMISSING this action, with prejudice, from the docket of this Court, consistent with the findings and recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 1/12/2012. (cc: Judge, USA, counsel, movant) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER AND NOTICE Movant is hereby Notified that pursuant to Antiterrorism and Effective Date Penalty Act Amendments to 28 USC 2255, motions for habeas relief filed under Section 2255 must be filed within one year from the date on which the judgment o f conviction becomes final; Movant is further hereby Notified that Section 2255 also limits a movant's ability to file a second or successive Section 2255 Motion; accordingly, it is hereby Ordered that Movant should inform the Court in writing b y Friday, 10/22/2010, if he does not wish to have his Motion to Dismiss Charges and Judgment re-characterized as a motion under Section 2255, should Movant not agree with the Court that his Motion to Dismiss Charges and Judgment should be re-characterized as a Section 2255 Motion, the undersigned will recommend that the District Court Dismiss his Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 9/27/2010. (cc: any unrepresented party) (skm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dixon v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marcus Darnell Dixon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | R. Gregory McVey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
