Perez v. Tusing
Robert Perez |
Courtney Tusing |
3:2010cv01188 |
October 6, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Cheryl A. Eifert |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopting 36 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; The Court grants defendant's 27 motion to dismiss and denies the movant's 39 Objection and Reported Defects of Proposed Findings and Recommendation; this action removed from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/11/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Perez v. Tusing | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert Perez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Courtney Tusing | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.