Perez v. Tusing
Plaintiff: Robert Perez
Defendant: Courtney Tusing
Case Number: 3:2010cv01188
Filed: October 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Huntington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A. Eifert
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopting 36 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; The Court grants defendant's 27 motion to dismiss and denies the movant's 39 Objection and Reported Defects of Proposed Findings and Recommendation; this action removed from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/11/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez v. Tusing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Courtney Tusing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?