Wilson v. Nohe
Tammy S. Wilson |
Lori Nohe |
3:2010cv01383 |
December 15, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Mason |
Cheryl A. Eifert |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MEMORANDUMM OPINION AND ORDER The Court adopts the 15 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; denying as moot 13 Motion for Appointment of Counsel and 11 Motion to Reconsider filed by Tammy S. Wilson; grants 9 Mot ion to Dismiss filed by Lori Nohe; Petitioner's 16 objections are denied; Petitioner may re-file this action in this Court after she has exhausted the State Court remedies available to her. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 7/6/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wilson v. Nohe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Tammy S. Wilson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Lori Nohe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.