Cox v. Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc.

Plaintiff: Carl B. Cox
Defendant: Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2011cv00843
Filed: November 2, 2011
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Huntington Office
County: Cabell
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Chambers
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 42:1395
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 2, 2012 14 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/2/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cox v. Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carl B. Cox
Represented By: Barry L. Bruce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc.
Represented By: David D. Amsbary
Represented By: Rebecca Craycraft Brown
Represented By: Thomas L. Craig
Represented By: Molly K. Frick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?