Jacobus v. Huerta

Jacobus v. Huerta

Defendant:	Michael Huerta
Petitioner:	Hank Jacobus
Case Number:	3:2012cv02032
Filed:	June 13, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Huntington Office
County:	Cabell
Presiding Judge:	Robert C. Chambers
Presiding Judge:	Cheryl A. Eifert
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 22, 2013	Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 30 Objections and adopting in full Magistrate Judge Eifert's 29 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; granting Defendant Michael Huerta's 25 RENEWED MOTION to dismiss and dismissing Plaintiff's complaint; denying Plaintiff's 18 and 24 PETITIONS for injunction and Plaintiff's 26 PETITION to add a defendant. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 4/22/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
February 22, 2013	Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS respecfully recommending that the presiding United States District Judge accept and adopt the findings herein and recommends that re: 26 Petition to Amend filed by Hank Jacobus, be denied 18 Petition for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Hank Jacobus be denied, 24 Petition for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Hank Jacobus be denied, and 25 Renewed Motion to Dismiss filed by Michael Huerta be Granted; Plaintiff's 2 Complaint and 23 Amended Complaint be Dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 2/22/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 22, 2013

Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 30 Objections and adopting in full Magistrate Judge Eifert's 29 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; granting Defendant Michael Huerta's 25 RENEWED MOTION to dismiss and dismissing Plaintiff's complaint; denying Plaintiff's 18 and 24 PETITIONS for injunction and Plaintiff's 26 PETITION to add a defendant. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 4/22/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)

February 22, 2013

Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS respecfully recommending that the presiding United States District Judge accept and adopt the findings herein and recommends that re: 26 Petition to Amend filed by Hank Jacobus, be denied 18 Petition for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Hank Jacobus be denied, 24 Petition for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Hank Jacobus be denied, and 25 Renewed Motion to Dismiss filed by Michael Huerta be Granted; Plaintiff's 2 Complaint and 23 Amended Complaint be Dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 2/22/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jacobus v. Huerta
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Hank Jacobus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Huerta
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?