Fields v. Norfolk and Southern Railway Company
Zachary Lyle Fields, Ronnie Lee Fields and Abbie Lynn Fields |
Norfolk and Southern Railway Company |
3:2012cv04046 |
August 3, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Kanawha |
Robert C. Chambers |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint; Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint no later than 12/24/2012; further directing Plaintiffs to complete service of process no later than 30 days after filing an ame nded Complaint; denying without prejudice Defendant's 4 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction and 12(b)(3) for improper venue to file a renewed motion; denying without prejudice Defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(4) for insufficient process to file a renewed motion if Plaintiffs do not properly serve Defendant within the time set forth in this Order; denying Defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5) for ins ufficient service of process; granting Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' loss of parental consortium claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim; Dismissing Plaintiffs' claims for loss of parental consortium. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 12/14/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (skm) (Modified on 12/14/2012 to clarify text) (mkw). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.