Ward v. Plymale et al
| Mark Delane Ward |
| Ted Backus, Lauren Plymale, Mike Clark, Alfred E. Ferguson, Shawn Bartram, Betty J. Wolford, John Laishley, WV Judicial Investigation Commission, WV Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Cabell County Sheriff Department, WV Supreme Court of Appeals and Cabell County Prosecuting Attorneys Office |
| 3:2012cv06186 |
| October 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Cabell |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Cheryl A. Eifert |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and Dismisses this action With Prejudice from the docket of the Court; the Court also Denies With Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Relief 24 ; the Court Denies a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 11/25/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Court accepts and incorporates herein the 17 findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and Denies Plaintiff's 5 motion for injunction, 11 motion for review of state court denial of mandamus relief, and 15 motion for an MRI of his leg consistant with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 7/17/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
