Hill et al v. Cartee Restaurant Group, Inc.
| Steve Hill and Melody Hilll |
| Cartee Restaurant Group, Inc. |
| 3:2013cv01960 |
| February 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Cabell |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 69 RENEWED MOTION in Limine to Prohibit And Exclude Any Testimony, Inference, Or Argument That Any Compensation Awarded To The Plaintiff Will Not Be Subject To State Or Federal Income Taxes; granting 70 RENE WED MOTION in Limine to Prohibit And Exclude Any Testimony, Inference, Or Argument Regarding The Plaintiffs' Attorneys' Financial Interest Or Motive; granting 71 MOTION in Limine to Permit Plaintiff To Submit Redacted Medical Expense Ex hibits To Conceal The Existence Of Collateral Source Payments And Discounts Or Alternatively To Present A Typewritten Summary Of Medical Expenses Incurred By Plaintiff, Melody Hill; granting 72 RENEWED MOTION in Limine to Prohibit And Exclude Any Evidence, Testimony Or Reference To Payments Made To The Plaintiff By Plaintiff's Employer, OhioHealth Coporation; denying 75 MOTION for an Adverse Jury Instruction due to Defendant's Spoliation of Relevant Evidence; granting in part and denying in part 77 OMNIBUS MOTION in Limine. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/6/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
