Skaggs v. Western Regional Jail et al
| Shelby Dean Skaggs |
| Western Regional Jail, W.V. Regional Jail Authority, W.V. Department of Corrections and Michael Clark |
| 3:2013cv03293 |
| February 27, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Cabell |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Cheryl A. Eifert |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER sustaining Plaintiff's 125 Objections and DECLINING to accept and incorporate the 121 Proposed Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge; DENYING Defendant's 117 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/31/2016. (cc: Magistrate Judge Tinsley; counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
|
|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 109 OBJECTIONS; accepting and incorporating the 106 Proposed Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge; granting Defendant Berlin's 92 Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion to Quash Service; granting Defendant Dr. Dominique Wong's 86 MOTION to Dismiss or, in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 1/21/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF STATUS CONFERENCE granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 61 MOTION to Join Additional Defendants; the complaint shall be amended to add Dr. Dominique Wong as a defendant; Plaintiff's request to a dd Prime Care Medical and AIG Property and Casualty Company is denied; Plaintiff's request to add Officer Berlin as a defendant is granted, but not his request to add Sergeant Lambert; Plaintiff's request to join Dr. Dionisio Policarpio, We xford Health, Ralph Price and Amanda Bell, L.P.N. is denied; directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 20 days of the date of this order; directing the Clerk to serve Dr. Wong and Officer Berlin with a summons and amended complaint; den ying as moot Plaintiff's 63 MOTION to Compel Defendants re: search for shoes and brace; denying as moot Michael Clark's 64 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Court Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 1/24/2014. (cc: Plaintiff, attys, and any unrepresented party) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 71 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Eifert; granting defendants W.V. Department of Corrections, W.V. Regional Jail Authority, Western Regional Jail's 14 M OTION to Dismiss Complaint; granting Defendant Michael Clark's 16 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint to the extent that Plaintiff has asserted claims against Clark in his official capacity and denying as to any claims asserted against Clark in his personal capacity; dismissing, with prejudice, Plaintiff's complaint against the Western Regional Jail, the West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority, and the West Virginia Department of Corrections, but continue to pend agai nst Defendant Michael Clark; removing the Western Regional Jail, the West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority, and the West Virginia Department of Corrections as defendants from the style of this civil action, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 1/8/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
