Evans v. City of Huntington et al
| Nicholas Evans |
| City of Huntington and Joseph W. Koher |
| 3:2013cv05316 |
| March 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Cabell |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendants' 85 MOTION to Preclude Documents Obtained from the Morehead, KY Police Department; granting Defendants' 83 MOTION to Preclude Documents Obtained from the Ashland, KY Police Department; granting Plaintiff's 87 MOTION to Preclude Defendants from Introducing BAC Evidence; denying as moot Defendants' 84 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Michael Graham from Testifying; denying as moot Plaintiff's 88 MOTION in Limi ne to Exclude Certain Opinions of Defense Expert Samuel Faulkner; granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 95 MOTION to Exclude Evidence, Testimony, or Reference to Other Lawsuits or Complaints, Including Use of Force Reports or Inves tigations; granting Defendants' 96 MOTION to Preclude Plaintiff from Referencing Polygraph Tests, Results, Information Learned Therefrom and Incidences of Misconduct by Officer Koher Committed Prior to Becoming a Law Enforcement Officer; granting Defendants' 101 MOTION to Exclude Plaintiff's Anticipated Offer of 404(b) Testimony. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 4/10/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
