Pearson et al v. Giles Industries, Inc. et al
||Teri A. Pearson and Darrell L. Pearson
||CMH of KY, Inc., Kitchen's Construction, Giles Industries, Inc. and Pritchard's Excavating & Mobile Home Transport
||July 12, 2013
||US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
||Robert C. Chambers
|Nature of Suit:
||Contract Product Liability
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 10, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 31 APPLICATION for Attorney Fees and Costs; directing Defendant's counsel, Jenna Perkins Wood, to reimburse Plaintiffs for $5,225 in attorneys' fees within 30 days from the entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order; directing that Defendant's untimely 34 Response to this Motion be stricken from the record; further directing Defendant's counsel to file Defendant's Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures within 7 days of the entry of this Order or face further sanctions. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 2/10/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|November 13, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant Prichard's Excavating and Mobile Home Transport's 24 MOTION to Set Aside Entry of Default and MOTION for Leave to File Answer; denying as moot Plaintiff's 25 MOTION to Enter Default Judgment; directing Plaintiffs to file motion to pursue attorney's fees and costs within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 11/13/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?