McGee et al v. Cole et al
Casie Jo McGee, Sarah Elizabeth Adkins, Justin Murdock, William Glavaris, Nancy Elizabeth Michael, Jane Louise Fenton and A.S.M. |
Karen S. Cole and Vera J. McCormick |
3:2013cv24068 |
October 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Cabell |
Robert C. Chambers |
Constitutionality of State Statutes |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 162 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 145 MOTION for Attorney Fees; finding as moot 152 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply ; granting 154 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amicus Curiae. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 7/16/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm) |
Filing 139 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiff's 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment; denying Defendant Vera J. McCormick's 26 MOTION to Dismiss, Defendant Karen S. Cole's 31 MOTION to Dismiss, Defendants' 62 JOINT MOTION f or Summary Judgment, the State of West Virginia's 66 CROSS-MOTION for Summary Judgment and the State of West Virginia's 85 MOTION to Dismiss; denying in part and denying as moot in part The State of West Virginia's 126 MOTION to Continue Merits Stay and to Calendar Oral Argument on Threshold Issues; denying as moot Plaintiff's 127 CROSS-MOTION to Lift Stay and Enter Judgment; granting Plaintiff's 131 MOTION to Lift Stay and Enter Judgment and 132 AMENDED MOTION to Lift Stay and Enter Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 11/7/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw) |
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part the 45 JOINT MOTION by Vera J. McCormick, Karen S. Cole to Strike 44 Notice of Supplemental Authority; the Court will consider the two exhibits attached to Plaintiffs' notice of supplemental auth ority but will not consider legal argument presented in the memorandum accompanying those exhibits; denying in part the 26 MOTION by Vera J. McCormick to Dismiss 8 Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief and 31 MOTION by Karen S. Cole to Dismiss 8 Complaint and reserving ruling as to abstention arising from the issue of whether the existing Defendants are sufficient to bind state authorities and all county clerks, should a ruling on the merits be made in favor of Plainti ffs; directing Plaintiffs, by 2/12/2014, to either 1) seek joinder of whatever additional parties they deem necessary to create greater certainty as to the effect of a ruling in this case, or 2) file a responsive pleading explaining why the existing Defendants in this lawsuit are sufficient to bind state authorities and all county clerks should a ruling on the merits be made in favor of Plaintiffs and why joinder of additional parties is not necessary; Defendants may file a response within seven days of Plaintiffs taking either action, and Plaintiffs may file a reply within three days of any response from Defendants; granting the 34 MOTION by State of West Virginia to Dismiss 8 Complaint and dismissing Plaintiffs' claim pertaining to West Virginia Code Section 48-2-603 (the non-recognition provision); Plaintiffs' claims as to the other portions of the marriage ban may proceed; directing that Plaintiffs may amend their Complaint by 2/12/2014; directing that Defendants shal l have 14 days from entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to file any responses to Plaintiffs' 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment; denying as moot the 53 MOTION by State of West Virginia to Amend the Deadline to Respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 1/29/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.