United States of America et al v. KAR Contracting, LLC et al
United States of America and Asphalt Contractors & Site Work, Inc. |
KAR Contracting, LLC and Great American Insurance Company |
3:2014cv27451 |
October 31, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Wayne |
Robert C. Chambers |
Miller Act |
40 U.S.C. ยง 270 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 46 JOINT MOTION and 48 SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT MOTION by Great American Insurance Company, KAR Contracting, LLC for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 12/4/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw) |
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 28 MOTION to Compel; directing that plaintiff provide full and complete responses to the discovery requests set forth in Defendants' motion, as they are amended in this Order, within fourteen (14) days of today's date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 8/10/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa) |
Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 8 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; granting in part as to Count IV and denying in part as to Counts I, II, and III, the statute of limitations defense, and Plaintiffs' claims for attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/11/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.