Broadnax v. United States of America et al
| Ethelbert Broadnax |
| United States of America, Huntington, West Virginia V.A.M.C., Beckley, West Virginia, V.A.M.C., Western Regional Jail, Amy Richmond, Wilds, Larry Large and Lisa Y. Webster |
| 3:2015cv02460 |
| May 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Cabell |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Cheryl A. Eifert |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 32 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; directing that Defendants' 29 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint be GRANTED; and Plaintiff's 5 amended complaint be DISMISSED, with prejudice, with the exception of Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Wilds, which should be DISMISSED without prejudice, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 12/15/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SEALING EXHIBIT directing the exhibits attached to the 1 Complaint to be sealed until appropriate redactions can me made by Plaintiff; directing Plaintiff to re-submit the exhibits within 14 days of the date of this Order, with the requisite redactions as specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2 and the Local Rules of this District. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 3/4/2015. (cc: Plaintiff, attys) (mkw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
