Brumfield v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. et al
William Brumfield |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., John K. Kessinger, Jane S. McElreath, Mark S. Gannon, Ricky L. Bradley and Don Shivers |
3:2015cv14127 |
October 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Cabell |
Robert C. Chambers |
Cheryl A. Eifert |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating herein the 39 Proposed Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge; granting Defendant Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company's 31 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing the complaint in its entirety; and removing this matter from the docket of the Court; further GRANTING Goodyear's request to impose an injunction and prohibiting Brumfield, without leave of court, from instituting any additional civil action against Goodyear in the Southern District of West Virginia, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/30/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 16 and 21 MOTIONS for the Court to order the United States Marshals Service to transport Plaintiff to various places in West Virginia and elsewhere and 17 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 11/20/2015. (cc: Plaintiff) (mkw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.