Collins v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
| Sean C. Collins |
| Lowe's Home Centers, LLC and Scott Horsfield |
| 3:2017cv01902 |
| March 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Putnam |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 65 MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaint and Add Additional Defendant. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/21/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (hkl)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS granting Defendants' 82 MOTION to File Under Seal; directing that Exhibit 4 to Defendants' 81 Response In Opposition to Plaintiff's 75 Motion for Protective Order to Stay the Subpoena of Josephine Collins be sealed and made a part of Defendants' Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 5/11/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 9 Partial Motion to Dismiss; dismissing Plaintiff's Harless claim referencing the WVHRA; allowing Plaintiff's Harless claim referencing the FMLA to continue. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 12/7/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (hkl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
