Cline v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association et al
| Santana Cline |
| HSBC Bank USA, National Association, Reisenfeld & Associates and Christopher Dawson |
| 3:2017cv02975 |
| July 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Putnam |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Cheryl A. Eifert |
| Other Contract |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 43 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert, to the extent they are not contradicted by this Memorandum Opinion and Order; granting Defendants' 15 an 29 Motions to Dismiss; denying Plaintiff's 33 Motion to Strike; dismissing this case, with prejudice; and directing the Clerk to remove it from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/28/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 32 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; denying Plaintiff's 22 Motion for the entry of default; granting HSBC's 27 Motion in opposition to the e ntry of default and request for leave to file a response to the complaint; and accepting the 29 Motion to Dismiss filed by HSBC as properly pending. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 11/21/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
