Smith v. Western Regional Jail
Plaintiff: James Arthur Smith, Jr.
Defendant: Western Regional Jail, Davis and Diamond
Case Number: 3:2017cv03502
Filed: July 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Huntington Office
County: Cabell
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Chambers
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A. Eifert
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 34 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; directing that Defendants' 20 and 30 Motions to Dismiss be granted and Plaintiff's 9 Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 5/4/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
November 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 19 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; granting 13 MOTION by Western Regional Jail to Dismiss 2 Complaint and 9 Amended Complaint; dismissing with prejud ice the 2 Complaint and 9 Amended Complaint; removing the Western Regional Jail from the caption of the case; and the remaining parties be permitted to proceed with the development of the case consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 11/13/2017. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
July 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $400 or submit to the Court an amended Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs, which includes the institutional certification, or an inmate account tr ansaction record; if Plaintiff claims that a person (or persons) acting under color of state law violated his federal civil or constitutional rights, Plaintiff must amend his complaint, as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 7/3/2017. (cc: Plaintiff) (mkw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Western Regional Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Arthur Smith, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Western Regional Jail
Represented By: Carrie A. Dysart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diamond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?