Javed et al v. Arthur
| Baseerat Javed and Tahera Javed |
| Sandra Arthur |
| 3:2017cv04626 |
| December 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Cabell |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part the 71 MOTION by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company to Strike Supplemental Expert Witnesses and Supplemental Alleged Damages or, in the Alternative, MOTION to Vacate 59 Amended Scheduling Order and Continue Trial; vacating the operative 59 Amended Scheduling Order and trial date; directing the parties to meet and file a Rule 26(f) report within fourteen days that addresses the length of discovery needed and other deadlines, including a proposed trial date; the Court will further address scheduling upon receiving the parties' report. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 4/27/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
|
|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting the 54 MOTION by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company to Strike Plaintiff's Expert Witnesses; denying as moot State Farm's Alternative 54 MOTION to Extend Deadline for Defendant to Disclose Expert Witnesses. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 1/14/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
