Warrix v. Western Regional Jail

Warrix v. Western Regional Jail

Plaintiff:	Shannon David Warrix
Defendant:	Western Regional Jail
Case Number:	3:2018cv00253
Filed:	February 2, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Huntington Office
County:	Cabell
Presiding Judge:	Robert C. Chambers
Presiding Judge:	Cheryl A. Eifert
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 25, 2018	Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; dismissing the complaint, without prejudice, and removing this matter from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 5/25/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
February 8, 2018	Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing the Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $400 or submit to the Court an amended Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs; further directing Plaintiff to amend his complaint within forty-fiv e (45) days and cure the deficiencies in the pleading as indicated herein; failure to amend the complaint as ordered may result in a recommendation that the complaint be dismissed; Plaintiff's 1 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs shall be held in abeyance pending initial review of Plaintiff's amended complaint or pending other further proceedings in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 2/8/2018. (cc: Plaintiff) (jsa)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 25, 2018

Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER accepting and incorporating the 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Eifert; dismissing the complaint, without prejudice, and removing this matter from the docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 5/25/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)

February 8, 2018

Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing the Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $400 or submit to the Court an amended Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs; further directing Plaintiff to amend his complaint within forty-fiv e (45) days and cure the deficiencies in the pleading as indicated herein; failure to amend the complaint as ordered may result in a recommendation that the complaint be dismissed; Plaintiff's 1 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs shall be held in abeyance pending initial review of Plaintiff's amended complaint or pending other further proceedings in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 2/8/2018. (cc: Plaintiff) (jsa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Warrix v. Western Regional Jail
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shannon David Warrix
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Western Regional Jail
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?