Ginn v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Adonis Ginn
Defendant: Craig S. Heligman, CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv01322
Filed: September 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert C Chambers
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Benjamin J. Wilensky on behalf of Adonis Ginn. (Wilensky, Benjamin)
November 13, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Tad T. Roumayah on behalf of Adonis Ginn. (Roumayah, Tad)
November 1, 2018 Filing 5 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Tad T. Roumayah on behalf of Adonis Ginn. Local counsel: Amy C. Crossan. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-6918155. (Crossan, Amy)
November 1, 2018 Filing 4 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Benjamin J. Wilensky on behalf of Adonis Ginn. Local counsel: Amy C. Crossan. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-6918102. (Crossan, Amy)
September 27, 2018 CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc)
September 27, 2018 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Eifert. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (jsa)
September 27, 2018 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to CSX Corporation, CSX Transportation, Inc., Craig S. Heligman, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachments: #1 summons as to CSX Corporation, #2 summons as to Craig Heligman) (jsa)
September 27, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-6824069. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jsa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ginn v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adonis Ginn
Represented By: Amy C. Crossan
Represented By: Tad T. Roumayah
Represented By: Benjamin J. Wilensky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Craig S. Heligman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSX Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?