Baxley v. Western Regional Jail
| John Baxley, Jr. |
| Western Regional Jail |
| 3:2018cv01526 |
| December 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Robert C Chambers |
| Cheryl A Eifert |
| Prisoner - (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $400 or submit a completed Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs; notifying Plaintiff that failure to pay the fee or submit an amended Application, as instructed, within 30 days of the date of this Order may result in a recommendation that the complaint be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 2/5/2019. (cc: Plaintiff with a copy of an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs) (mkw)
|
|
Filing 8
AMENDED COMPLAINT by John Baxley, Jr. against Western Regional Jail. (hkl)
|
|
Filing 7
AUTHORIZATION TO RELEASE INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNT INFORMATION by John Baxley, Jr. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (hkl)
|
|
Filing 6
APPLICATION by John Baxley, Jr to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert. (hkl)
|
|
Filing 5
MAIL RETURNED AS UNDELIVERABLE. Mail sent to John Baxley at WESTERN REGIONAL JAIL, One O'Hanlon Place, Barboursville, WV 25504. Mail resent to John Baxley at STEVENS CORRECTIONAL CENTER, 795 Virginia Avenue, Welch, WV 24801. (hkl)
|
|
Filing 4
MAIL RETURNED AS UNDELIVERABLE. Mail sent to John Baxley at WESTERN REGIONAL JAIL, One O'Hanlon Place, Barboursville, WV 25504. Mail resent to John Baxley at STEVENS CORRECTIONAL CENTER, 795 Virginia Avenue, Welch, WV 24801. (hkl)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $400 or submit to the Court a completed and signed Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs; further directing Plaintiff to amend his complaint as specified herein within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 12/20/2018. (cc: Plaintiff with an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs and instructions) (jsa)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (jsa)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT. (jsa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baxley v. Western Regional Jail | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Western Regional Jail | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Baxley, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
