Ferguson v. Bizzack Construction, LLC
| Richard Ferguson |
| Bizzack Construction, LLC |
| 3:2019cv00382 |
| May 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Robert C Chambers |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM by Bizzack Construction, LLC in support of #9 MOTION by Bizzack Construction, LLC to Dismiss #1 Complaint. (Sweeney, Robert) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Bizzack Construction, LLC to Dismiss #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B Affidavit)(Sweeney, Robert) |
Filing 8
ORDER AND NOTICE: Rule 12(b) Motions 7/8/2019. Rule 26(f) Meeting 7/22/2019. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) Meeting 7/29/2019. Scheduling/status Conference at 11:30 AM on 8/12/2019 in Huntington. Entry of Scheduling Order 8/19/2019. Last Day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures 8/26/2019. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/17/2019. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Bizzack Construction, LLC (Sweeney, Robert) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER TO #1 Complaint With Jury Demand by Bizzack Construction, LLC.(Sweeney, Robert) (Modified on 6/14/2019 to add jury demand)(ts). |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME for Bizzack Construction, LLC re: #1 Complaint to June 14, 2019 by Bizzack Construction, LLC, Richard Ferguson (Sweeney, Robert) (Modified on 6/14/2019 to add party filer) (ts). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ACCEPTED FOR SERVICE BY SECRETARY OF STATE on 5/20/2019 as to Bizzack Construction, LLC. (hkl) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Eifert. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (jsa) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Bizzack Construction, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (jsa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # BWVSDC-7235135. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jsa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ferguson v. Bizzack Construction, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bizzack Construction, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Robert H. Sweeney, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Ferguson | |
| Represented By: | James D. McQueen, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
