Pruitt v. Saul
Clarence Mack Pruitt |
Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Saul |
3:2019cv00383 |
May 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Omar J Aboulhosn |
Robert C Chambers |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. § 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE: Replaced defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Social Security Commissioner with Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security and updated case title. (mwk) (ADI) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE/CERTIFICATION by Clarence Mack Pruitt to the Court's #4 Order. (Attachment: #1 Certificate of Service)(Pence, David) |
|
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Nancy A. Berryhill, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 60 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (hkl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7235316. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (hkl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.