Moses v. Saul
| Virginia A. Moses |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2020cv00202 |
| March 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Robert C Chambers |
| Dwane L Tinsley |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting Defendant's #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint; Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint due 7/29/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 5/21/2020. (cc: counsel of record) (hkl)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Andrew Saul for Extension of Time to File Answer to July 29, 2020. (Attachment: #1 Declaration) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley.(Neil, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew Saul, re: #2 Complaint. Summons returnable 60 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (hkl) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER AND NOTICE ALLOWING THE PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS AND FEES granting Plaintiff's #1 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs; directing the Clerk of the Court to issue the summonses; directing the Plaintiff to serve the summonses pursuant to Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; further directing that the recovery, if any, obtained in the action shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court, who shall pay therefrom all unpaid costs and fees taxed against the plaintiff and pay the balance to the plaintiff and his/her attorney, if any. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 3/24/2020. (cc: Plaintiff; counsel of record; USM) (hkl)
|
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS SUBMITTED by Virginia A. Moses for Andrew Saul, re: #2 Complaint. (hkl) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (hkl) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION by Virginia A. Moses to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs (Attachment: #1 Proposed Order) (hkl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moses v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Nora R. Koch |
| Represented By: | Gregory P. Neil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Virginia A. Moses | |
| Represented By: | James T. Meisel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
