Thompson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff: Darrell A. Thompson
Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv00699
Filed: October 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert C Chambers
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER AND NOTICE: Rule 12(b) Motions 12/7/2020. Rule 26(f) Meeting 12/21/2020. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) Meeting 12/28/2020. Scheduling/status Conference at 11:30 AM on 1/11/2021 in Huntington. Entry of Scheduling Order 1/19/2021. Last Day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures 1/25/2021. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 11/18/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ANSWERS AND DEFENSES to #1 Complaint by CSX Transportation, Inc. (Thomas, Elizabeth)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Cameron Kynes on behalf of CSX Transportation, Inc. Local counsel: Elizabeth Thomas. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7795559. (Thomas, Elizabeth)
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Thomas R. Brice on behalf of CSX Transportation, Inc. Local counsel: Elizabeth Thomas. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7795546. (Thomas, Elizabeth)
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS ACCEPTED FOR SERVICE BY SECRETARY OF STATE on 10/27/2020 as to CSX Transportation, Inc.. Certified Mail Number: 92148901125134100002941991. (jsa)
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to CSX Transportation, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (hkl)
October 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Eifert. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (hkl)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7775091. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (hkl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darrell A. Thompson
Represented By: Kirk Auvil
Represented By: Gregory G. Paul
Represented By: Anthony Brunicardi, II
Represented By: Walt Auvil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Represented By: Elizabeth M. Thomas
Represented By: Cameron G. Kynes
Represented By: Thomas R. Brice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?