Johnson v. Saul
| Eugene M. Johnson, III |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2021cv00024 |
| January 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Robert C Chambers |
| Cheryl A Eifert |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Eugene M. Johnson, III for service upon Andrew Saul, re: #2 Complaint. Andrew Saul served on 1/20/2021, answer due 3/22/2021. Person Served: Vicky Dickerson. Return Receipt Card for Attorney General signed on 1/22/2021. Return Receipt Card for Commissioner of Social Security signed on 1/23/2020 [sic]. (Attachment: #1 Green Return Receipt Cards)(Hicks, Kenneth) (Modified on 1/29/2021 to correct the date served and answer due date and add link to #2 complaint) (mkw).
|
|
RESET DEADLINE: Andrew Saul answer due 3/22/2021. (mkw)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew Saul, re: #2 Complaint. Summons returnable 60 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (jsa)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER AND NOTICE ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS AND FEES granting Plaintiff's #1 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs; directing that the Clerk of the Court shall issue the summonses and the plaintiff shall serve the summonses and Complaint pursuant to Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; further directing that the recovery, if any, obtained in this action shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court, who shall pay therefrom all unpaid costs and fees taxed against the plaintiff and pay the balance to the plaintiff and his attorney, if any. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 1/13/2021. (cc: counsel of record) (jsa)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS SUBMITTED by Eugene M. Johnson for Andrew Saul, re: #2 Complaint. (hkl)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (hkl)
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION by Eugene M. Johnson to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (hkl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Nora R. Koch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eugene M. Johnson, III | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth P. Hicks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
