Doe et al v. Cabell County Board of Education et al
| Jane Doe and John Doe |
| Cabell County Board of Education and Jason Curry |
| 3:2021cv00031 |
| January 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Robert C Chambers |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sean K. Hammers, Prosecuting Attorney for Cabell County, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (hkl)
|
|
Filing 10
SUMMONS SUBMITTED by John Doe, Jane Doe for Cabell County Board of Education, Jason Curry, re: #1 Complaint. (Bastress, Robert) (Modified on 3/9/2021 to add link to #1 complaint) (mkw).
|
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ryan Saxe, Superintendent and Mary Neely, President of Cabell County Board of Education, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachment: #1 Summons for Mary Neely, President) (hkl)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS SUBMITTED by John Doe, Jane Doe for Cabell County Board of Education, re: #1 Complaint. (Bastress, Robert) (Modified on 3/8/2021 to add link to #1 complaint) (mkw).
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS SUBMITTED by John Doe, Jane Doe for Cabell County Board of Education, re: #1 Complaint. (Bastress, Robert) (Modified on 3/8/2021 to add link to #1 complaint) (mkw).
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Cabell County Board of Education in support of #5 MOTION by Cabell County Board of Education to Dismiss With Prejudice, re: #1 Complaint. (Oxley, Perry)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION by Cabell County Board of Education to Dismiss With Prejudice, re: #1 Complaint. (Oxley, Perry)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Personal Service for Cabell County Board of Education, re: #1 Complaint. Cabell County Board of Education served on 2/9/2021, answer due 3/2/2021. Summons served on Receptionist. (Bastress, Robert) (Additional attachment added on 2/22/2021: #1 Summons) (mkw). (Modified on 2/22/2021 to add link to #1 complaint and to add a copy of the summons as an attachment) (mkw).
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cabell County Board of Education, Jason Curry, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachment: #1 Summons for Jason Curry) (hkl)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Eifert. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (hkl)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7852831. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (hkl)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
