Balzer & Associates, Inc. v. The West Virginia Building, LLC et al
Balzer & Associates, Inc. |
Alexander Vence and The West Virginia Building, LLC |
3:2021cv00272 |
April 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Robert C Chambers |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS ACCEPTED FOR SERVICE BY SECRETARY OF STATE on 5/6/2021 as to Alexander Vence. Certified Mail Number: 92148901125134100003117661. (jsa) |
CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to The West Virginia Building, LLC, Alexander Vence, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachments: #1 Summons for Alexander Vence) (hkl) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Eifert. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (hkl) |
Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7934784. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (hkl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.