Kraim v. Mariott et al
| Indigo Ocean Rose Kraim |
| Charleston West Virginia Police Department, Channel 13 News and Mariott |
| 3:2021cv00329 |
| June 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Robert C Chambers |
| Cheryl A Eifert |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $400 or submit a completed and signed Application to Proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order; further directing Plaintiff to amend her complaint within thirty (30) days and cure the deficiencies, as more fully set forth herein; Plaintiff is hereby given notice that a failure to amend the complaint as ordered will result in a recommendation that the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim and/or for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 7/26/2021. (cc: Plaintiff with an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs) (jsa)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT. (jsa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
