Duty v. Runyon et al
| Danny Nathaniel Page Duty |
| Daniel Runyon, Jeffery Daniel Williams, Michael Smith, Western Regional Jail and State of W.V. |
| 3:2021cv00420 |
| July 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Robert C Chambers |
| Cheryl A Eifert |
| Prisoner - (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing Plaintiff to amend his complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order; Plaintiff is hereby given notice that a failure to amend the complaint as ordered shall result in a recommendation that the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim and/or for failure to prosecute; Plaintiff's #1 Application to proceed in forma pauperis shall be held in abeyance pending the filing of Plaintiff's amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 8/4/2021. (cc: Plaintiff) (jsa)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT. (jsa)
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION by Danny Nathaniel Page Duty to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (jsa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
