Braga v. Advance Stores Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kyle Braga
Defendant: Advance Stores Company, Inc. and Advance Stores Company, Inc. doing business as Advance Auto Parts
Case Number: 3:2023cv00355
Filed: April 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert C Chambers
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 77 U.S.C. ยง 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2023 Filing 5 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Kyle Braga, Advance Stores Company, Inc.; the parties stipulate and agree that Defendant is afforded an extension of time within which to respond to the #1 Complaint, until on or before July 6, 2023. (Attachment: #1 Certificate of Service)(Presley, Marla) (Modified on 5/16/2023 to add party filer) (mkw).
May 16, 2023 RESET DEADLINE: Advance Stores Company, Inc. answer due 7/6/2023. (mkw)
May 3, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED BY CERTIFIED MAIL for Advance Stores Company, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Return Receipt Card signed by an agent of the same on behalf of Advance Stores Company, Inc. Advance Stores Company, Inc. served on 5/1/2023, answer due 5/22/2023. (Glazer, Hoyt) (Additional attachment added on 5/3/2023: #1 Summons) (Modified on 5/3/2023 to remove link to #2 summons and to add the summons as an attachment) (mkw).
April 26, 2023 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Eifert. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (cla)
April 26, 2023 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Advance Stores Company, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (cla)
April 25, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8412003. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons as to Advance Stores Company, Incorporated, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (cla)
April 25, 2023 CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Braga v. Advance Stores Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kyle Braga
Represented By: Hoyt E. Glazer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advance Stores Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Advance Stores Company, Inc. doing business as Advance Auto Parts
Represented By: Marla N. Presley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?