Adkins v. Menard, Inc. et al
Ida Adkins |
Menard, Inc. and Menards Barboursville |
3:2023cv00724 |
November 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Robert C Chambers |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Menard, Inc., Menards Barboursville for Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to the Plaintiff. (Adkins, David) |
|
Filing 5 RULE 26(f) REPORT OF PLANNING MEETING by Ida Adkins, Menard, Inc., Menards Barboursville. (Adkins, David) (Modified on 12/12/2023 to add party filer) (mkw). |
Filing 4 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT by Menard, Inc., Menards Barboursville attached to the #1 Notice of Removal. (Adkins, David) (Modified on 11/14/2023 to add link to #1 notice of removal) (mkw). |
|
CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Eifert. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (skm) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Menards Barboursville, Menard, Inc. with summons, complaint, Notice to Clerk of Filing Notice of Removal and docket sheet from Circuit Court of Cabell County. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-8532658. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (skm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.