Starkweather v. SunCoke Energy, Inc.
| Diana Starkweather |
| SunCoke Energy, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00777 |
| December 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Robert C Chambers |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER AND NOTICE: Rule 12(b) Motions - 2/20/2024. Rule 26(f) Meeting - 3/11/2024. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) Meeting - 3/18/2024. Scheduling/status conference at 11:30 AM on 4/1/2024 in Huntington. Entry of Scheduling Order - 4/8/2024. Last Day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures - 4/15/2024. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 1/30/2024. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
|
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant SunCoke Energy, Inc. (Wallace, Richard) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE AND OTHER DEFENSES to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint by SunCoke Energy, Inc. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wallace, Richard) |
| SunCoke Energy, Inc. answer due 1/29/2024 pursuant to the #4 Stipulation. (mkw) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Richard M. Wallace on behalf of SunCoke Energy, Inc. (Wallace, Richard) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Diana Starkweather, SunCoke Energy, Inc.; the parties stipulate to an extension of time, to and including January 29, 2024, for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs #1 Complaint. (Wallace, Richard) (Modified on 12/22/2023 to add party filer) (mkw). |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Eifert. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to SunCoke Energy, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachment: #1 summons as to SunCoke Energy, Inc.) (jsa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $405.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8551144. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (jsa) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Starkweather v. SunCoke Energy, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diana Starkweather | |
| Represented By: | Hoyt E. Glazer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SunCoke Energy, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kaitlyn Brooke Samuelson |
| Represented By: | Richard M. Wallace |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
