Dixon v. West Virginia State Police et al
| Curtis James Dixon |
| West Virginia State Police, Colonel C. J. Chambers and WVSP Trooper Toler |
| 3:2025cv00171 |
| March 19, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED SEPTEMBER 1, 2024. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph K. Reeder. (cc: counsel of record; any pro se party) (skm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 as to Curtis James Dixon. (skm) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to West Virginia State Police, Colonel C. J. Chambers, Trooper Toler, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachments: #1 Summons as to Colonel C.J. Chambers, #2 Summons as to Trooper Toler) (skm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand. Filing Fee $405.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8847624. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (skm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
