Gregory v. Coleman
Alvin Lee Gregory |
Michael V. Coleman |
5:2002cv00472 |
March 3, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Beckley Office |
David A. Faber |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Because these issues have already been decided on appeal, the Court DENIES petitioner's 84 MOTION to Vacate judgment and 85 MOTION for Leave to File instanter objections to the denial of petitioner's motion to vacate judgment. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 03/03/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mls) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gregory v. Coleman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alvin Lee Gregory | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael V. Coleman | |
Represented By: | Heather A. Connolly |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.