Motto v. Correctional Medical Services, St Louis, MO et al
| 5:2006cv00163 |
| November 16, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Beckley Office |
| Thomas E. Johnston |
| R. Clarke VanDervort |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: granting Defendants' 85 and 88 MOTIONS for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiff's 149 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 11/16/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
|
Filing
158
ORDER: Defendant's 85 and 88 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED and 149 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment is DENIED; A memorandum opinion setting forth specific findings and conclusions will follow. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 9/30/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mls)
|
|
Filing
141
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: After reviewing the record, 137 Magistrate Judge VanDervort's Order denying Correctional Medical Sevices Inc.'s Motion for Protective Order is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 2/9/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Motto v. Correctional Medical Services, St Louis, MO et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
