Treadway et al v. BGS Construction, Inc.
5:2006cv00191 |
March 15, 2006 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Beckley Office |
Thomas E. Johnston |
Labor: Railway Labor Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 179 FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER: granting Plaintiffs' 177 MOTION to Convert Settlement to Judgment; entering Judgment in favor of plaintiffs against defendant BGS Construction in the total amount of $281,040.75, plus interest. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 8/21/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr) |
Filing 176 ORDER GRANTING APPROVAL OF FLSA SETTLEMENT: The stay imposed by the Court's Order of 03/05/2009, is LIFTED; Plaintiff's 175 MOTION for Approval of Settlement and exhibits attached thereto is GRANTED; Plaintiff's counsel are AWARDED a ttorney's fees and reimbursement of expenses and costs in the prosecution of this case in the sum of $90,000.00 to be divided as agreed; Directing Defendant to make payments in the manner and according to the schedule agreed in the settlement; The above-styled action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 5/13/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mls) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Treadway et al v. BGS Construction, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.